<label id="xi47v"><meter id="xi47v"></meter></label>
       
      Interview: Brexit talks are art of giving up rather than having it all: expert
                       Source: Xinhua | 2018-03-31 18:42:20 | Editor: huaxia

      Photo taken on June 24, 2016 shows then British Prime Minister David Cameron (L) leaving with his wife Samantha after his speech at 10 Downing Street in London, Britain. Cameron announced his intention to step down after his country has voted to leave the European Union (EU). (Xinhua/Han Yan)

      BRUSSELS, March 31 (Xinhua) -- The hard question during Brexit talks will be what about both sides are prepared to give up, said Maria Demertzis, deputy director of the Brussels-based think tank Bruegel.

      Commenting on the outcomes of the European Union (EU) summit last week, Demertzis told Xinhua in an exclusive interview recently that any credible progress would be one in which the issue of Northern Ireland is resolved.

      "This will be the sole criteria of what would be a credible progress because unless the Northern Island issue is resolved, it's very difficult to see what type of trade agreement we will have. I think the two are very closely interlinked," she said.

      During the summit, EU27 leaders endorsed guidelines for the second phase Brexit talks and a transitional deal agreeing a contentious "backstop solution" keeping Northern Ireland signed up to EU rules in order to avoid a hard border with the Republic of Ireland.

      Suggesting "you can't have both ways," Demertzis said if Northern Island is kept in the customs union without the rest of Britain, it would mean a hard border on the sea.

      "I don't see how this can work unless something is done in the direction of a virtual border. Everything is being done digitally, but even that I'm not entirely sure how workable it is," she said.

      Given the green light by EU27 leaders during the two-day summit, the guidelines were widely seen as a starting point for EU-Britain future relationship talks.

      Local media widely expected that the talks' starting point would be Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA)-type, i.e. the "Canadian" model, or European Economic Area (EEA)-type, the Norwegian model.

      A CETA-type trade deal offers relatively limited access in services, with no passporting rights for financial services -- an important sector for Britain.

      On the other hand, an EEA-type agreement would give Britain much of what it is looking for in trade, including passporting rights for financial services. But it also requires free movement of labor -- a demand that Britain is not willing to accept.

      "I think the UK would prefer to start from a CETA agreement and then add to it something for financial services ... I think the UK will capitulate at some point and probably try and arrange something along the lines of what the EU asks," said Demertzis.

      "But again that's going to be a difficult thing to sell at home (in Britain). You might create domestically some political instability," she noted, adding that "the EU would prefer something much closer to what we have right now."

      The final results would be determined only by the threat of a very hard Brexit close at the time, she noted.

      "Typically how the EU works -- always on the last minute it notches up a deal. I hope it's a good economic deal but I think that at some point the UK is going to have sort of putting a lot of water in the wine and accept that for economic gains they need to abide by the EU legislation," said the economist.

      To Demertzis, the best outcome for the future relationship would be something like the EEA but at the same time allowing for the fact that Britain won a referendum on limiting the movement of labor.

      "Economically it's a good outcome and it allows the UK to declare a victory at home by saying that we have restricted the movement of labor, which is the whole point of this referendum," she said.

      In addition, the EEA-minus agreement also implies that the EU is ready to accept that the four freedoms (free movement of goods, services and capital and labor) are not unbreakable, she said.

      "That is difficult but in my view the EU need to accept that because you have a country that is leaving. They (British people) have the right to determine this. At the same time, they do not destroy the economic relationships that we have established after 50 years of cooperation, so that I think would be the best outcome ought to be," she said.

      Back to Top Close
      Xinhuanet

      Interview: Brexit talks are art of giving up rather than having it all: expert

      Source: Xinhua 2018-03-31 18:42:20

      Photo taken on June 24, 2016 shows then British Prime Minister David Cameron (L) leaving with his wife Samantha after his speech at 10 Downing Street in London, Britain. Cameron announced his intention to step down after his country has voted to leave the European Union (EU). (Xinhua/Han Yan)

      BRUSSELS, March 31 (Xinhua) -- The hard question during Brexit talks will be what about both sides are prepared to give up, said Maria Demertzis, deputy director of the Brussels-based think tank Bruegel.

      Commenting on the outcomes of the European Union (EU) summit last week, Demertzis told Xinhua in an exclusive interview recently that any credible progress would be one in which the issue of Northern Ireland is resolved.

      "This will be the sole criteria of what would be a credible progress because unless the Northern Island issue is resolved, it's very difficult to see what type of trade agreement we will have. I think the two are very closely interlinked," she said.

      During the summit, EU27 leaders endorsed guidelines for the second phase Brexit talks and a transitional deal agreeing a contentious "backstop solution" keeping Northern Ireland signed up to EU rules in order to avoid a hard border with the Republic of Ireland.

      Suggesting "you can't have both ways," Demertzis said if Northern Island is kept in the customs union without the rest of Britain, it would mean a hard border on the sea.

      "I don't see how this can work unless something is done in the direction of a virtual border. Everything is being done digitally, but even that I'm not entirely sure how workable it is," she said.

      Given the green light by EU27 leaders during the two-day summit, the guidelines were widely seen as a starting point for EU-Britain future relationship talks.

      Local media widely expected that the talks' starting point would be Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA)-type, i.e. the "Canadian" model, or European Economic Area (EEA)-type, the Norwegian model.

      A CETA-type trade deal offers relatively limited access in services, with no passporting rights for financial services -- an important sector for Britain.

      On the other hand, an EEA-type agreement would give Britain much of what it is looking for in trade, including passporting rights for financial services. But it also requires free movement of labor -- a demand that Britain is not willing to accept.

      "I think the UK would prefer to start from a CETA agreement and then add to it something for financial services ... I think the UK will capitulate at some point and probably try and arrange something along the lines of what the EU asks," said Demertzis.

      "But again that's going to be a difficult thing to sell at home (in Britain). You might create domestically some political instability," she noted, adding that "the EU would prefer something much closer to what we have right now."

      The final results would be determined only by the threat of a very hard Brexit close at the time, she noted.

      "Typically how the EU works -- always on the last minute it notches up a deal. I hope it's a good economic deal but I think that at some point the UK is going to have sort of putting a lot of water in the wine and accept that for economic gains they need to abide by the EU legislation," said the economist.

      To Demertzis, the best outcome for the future relationship would be something like the EEA but at the same time allowing for the fact that Britain won a referendum on limiting the movement of labor.

      "Economically it's a good outcome and it allows the UK to declare a victory at home by saying that we have restricted the movement of labor, which is the whole point of this referendum," she said.

      In addition, the EEA-minus agreement also implies that the EU is ready to accept that the four freedoms (free movement of goods, services and capital and labor) are not unbreakable, she said.

      "That is difficult but in my view the EU need to accept that because you have a country that is leaving. They (British people) have the right to determine this. At the same time, they do not destroy the economic relationships that we have established after 50 years of cooperation, so that I think would be the best outcome ought to be," she said.

      010020070750000000000000011100001370792551
      主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品免费视频一区| 国产成人yy免费视频| 免费看小12萝裸体视频国产| 亚洲同性男gay网站在线观看| 你懂的网址免费国产| 亚洲精品无码高潮喷水在线| 永久免费观看黄网站| 亚洲国产精品综合久久一线| 免费精品国产自产拍在线观看| 免费观看国产小粉嫩喷水| 最新亚洲人成网站在线观看| 免费v片在线观看| 免费人成动漫在线播放r18 | 亚洲国产成人久久精品大牛影视| 免费在线观看的网站| 亚洲国产AV一区二区三区四区| 亚洲AV无码专区亚洲AV伊甸园| baoyu122.永久免费视频| 色噜噜AV亚洲色一区二区| 国产线视频精品免费观看视频| 久久亚洲国产中v天仙www| 久久国产成人亚洲精品影院| 国产亚洲Av综合人人澡精品| 亚洲人成影院在线无码观看| 91视频精品全国免费观看| 亚洲欧美国产国产综合一区| 久久久久亚洲精品美女| 亚洲AV无码专区日韩| 一二三四免费观看在线电影| 丁香花在线视频观看免费| 99亚洲精品卡2卡三卡4卡2卡| 亚洲视频中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品无码成人AAA片| 免费A级毛片无码A∨男男| 色窝窝免费一区二区三区| 午夜爽爽爽男女免费观看影院| 五级黄18以上免费看| 亚洲av无码成人精品区一本二本 | 国产91成人精品亚洲精品| 亚洲一级毛片免费看| 亚洲av无码专区国产乱码在线观看 |