"/>

      <label id="xi47v"><meter id="xi47v"></meter></label>

      Protectionist tariffs no solution for U.S. trade imbalance

      Source: Xinhua    2018-03-30 16:38:00

      CHICAGO, March 29 (Xinhua) -- U.S. protectionist measures of unilaterally imposing steep tariffs will not solve trade problem but risk opening a Pandora's box to backfire on its own economy, said U.S. experts.

      "The recent action by U.S. President (Donald) Trump to slap tariffs on China outside of the established WTO rules ... is troubling," Tom Watkins, an advisor to Michigan-China Innovation Center, told Xinhua in a recent interview.

      "While it has some short term political benefit to President Trump's political base of disenfranchised voters, it is unlikely to have any significant long-term economic benefit to working class people in America, nor address real issue of free and fair trade imbalances," Watkins said.

      Many U.S. scholars echoed Watkins' view, as Trump signed a memorandum last week that could impose tariffs on up to 60 billion U.S. dollars of imports from China and place restrictions on Chinese investments in the United States.

      China's Ministry of Commerce issued a warning the following day and also announced a plan for reciprocal tariffs on imported U.S. products worth about 3 billion dollars, targeting 128 categories of U.S. products including pork, wine and seamless steel tubes.

      "Tariffs are not going to correct the trade deficit with China," said Khairy Tourk, a professor with the Stuart School of Business of the Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago. "The reality is that the tariff burden will fall on the silent majority, the consumers. This would be difficult for the middle class and it could backfire on those responsible for the price increases."

      Tourk said China's measured response shows that Beijing is not eager to start a trade war. "Obviously, if the situation is to escalate, the global economy will suffer," the expert added.

      "A trade war only disadvantages our already disadvantaged populations," said William J. Carroll, president emeritus of the Benedictine University.

      U.S. National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) posted a statement on its website the same day when Trump signed the memorandum, in which NPPC President Jim Heimerl said higher tariffs on imports from China will in turn harm U.S. producers and undermine the rural economy.

      "No one wins in these tit-for-tat trade disputes, least of all the farmers and the consumers," said Heimerl.

      U.S. pork industry exported 1.1 billion dollars of products to China in 2017. "China is a very important market for U.S. pork producers. In 2017, China was the second largest U.S. pork export market by volume and the third largest export market by value," Jim Monroe, NPPC senior communications director, told Xinhua.

      Scholars said U.S. trade deficit is a problem, but not in the way Trump's administration thinks. "The deficit reflects lack of savings," said Tourk. It in fact reflects a deeper problem of imbalance in the flow of international investment.

      "The best policy to increase American exports is to increase productivity," the professor said, adding this will require years to accomplish.

      Editor: Zhou Xin
      Related News
      Xinhuanet

      Protectionist tariffs no solution for U.S. trade imbalance

      Source: Xinhua 2018-03-30 16:38:00

      CHICAGO, March 29 (Xinhua) -- U.S. protectionist measures of unilaterally imposing steep tariffs will not solve trade problem but risk opening a Pandora's box to backfire on its own economy, said U.S. experts.

      "The recent action by U.S. President (Donald) Trump to slap tariffs on China outside of the established WTO rules ... is troubling," Tom Watkins, an advisor to Michigan-China Innovation Center, told Xinhua in a recent interview.

      "While it has some short term political benefit to President Trump's political base of disenfranchised voters, it is unlikely to have any significant long-term economic benefit to working class people in America, nor address real issue of free and fair trade imbalances," Watkins said.

      Many U.S. scholars echoed Watkins' view, as Trump signed a memorandum last week that could impose tariffs on up to 60 billion U.S. dollars of imports from China and place restrictions on Chinese investments in the United States.

      China's Ministry of Commerce issued a warning the following day and also announced a plan for reciprocal tariffs on imported U.S. products worth about 3 billion dollars, targeting 128 categories of U.S. products including pork, wine and seamless steel tubes.

      "Tariffs are not going to correct the trade deficit with China," said Khairy Tourk, a professor with the Stuart School of Business of the Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago. "The reality is that the tariff burden will fall on the silent majority, the consumers. This would be difficult for the middle class and it could backfire on those responsible for the price increases."

      Tourk said China's measured response shows that Beijing is not eager to start a trade war. "Obviously, if the situation is to escalate, the global economy will suffer," the expert added.

      "A trade war only disadvantages our already disadvantaged populations," said William J. Carroll, president emeritus of the Benedictine University.

      U.S. National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) posted a statement on its website the same day when Trump signed the memorandum, in which NPPC President Jim Heimerl said higher tariffs on imports from China will in turn harm U.S. producers and undermine the rural economy.

      "No one wins in these tit-for-tat trade disputes, least of all the farmers and the consumers," said Heimerl.

      U.S. pork industry exported 1.1 billion dollars of products to China in 2017. "China is a very important market for U.S. pork producers. In 2017, China was the second largest U.S. pork export market by volume and the third largest export market by value," Jim Monroe, NPPC senior communications director, told Xinhua.

      Scholars said U.S. trade deficit is a problem, but not in the way Trump's administration thinks. "The deficit reflects lack of savings," said Tourk. It in fact reflects a deeper problem of imbalance in the flow of international investment.

      "The best policy to increase American exports is to increase productivity," the professor said, adding this will require years to accomplish.

      [Editor: huaxia]
      010020070750000000000000011100001370774261
      主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲大片免费观看| 中文字幕日韩亚洲| 色在线亚洲视频www| 美女内射无套日韩免费播放| 亚洲国产精品无码成人片久久| 黄页视频在线观看免费| 亚洲精品tv久久久久久久久久| 国产亚洲精品美女2020久久| 日本高清免费不卡在线| 高h视频在线免费观看| 亚洲偷自拍拍综合网| 99精品视频在线观看免费| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99| XXX2高清在线观看免费视频| 国产∨亚洲V天堂无码久久久| 久久久国产精品福利免费| 中文字幕亚洲色图| 一二三四影视在线看片免费 | 亚洲国产婷婷六月丁香| 亚洲免费人成在线视频观看| 亚洲AV无码成人精品区天堂| 亚洲免费视频播放| 亚洲AV无码男人的天堂| 亚洲色图综合在线| 免费A级毛片无码视频| 亚洲综合国产成人丁香五月激情| 麻豆精品国产免费观看| 国产精品免费αv视频| 久久亚洲一区二区| 日韩精品视频免费网址| 成在线人视频免费视频 | 亚洲精品国产av成拍色拍| 免费在线不卡视频| 久久国产精品2020免费m3u8 | 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品第1页| 久久午夜夜伦鲁鲁片免费无码| 亚洲av日韩av综合| 亚洲中文字幕无码专区 | 国产一级一片免费播放i| a在线观看免费网址大全| 久久精品亚洲AV久久久无码|