"/>

      <label id="xi47v"><meter id="xi47v"></meter></label>

      Protectionist tariffs no solution for U.S. trade imbalance

      Source: Xinhua    2018-03-30 16:38:00

      CHICAGO, March 29 (Xinhua) -- U.S. protectionist measures of unilaterally imposing steep tariffs will not solve trade problem but risk opening a Pandora's box to backfire on its own economy, said U.S. experts.

      "The recent action by U.S. President (Donald) Trump to slap tariffs on China outside of the established WTO rules ... is troubling," Tom Watkins, an advisor to Michigan-China Innovation Center, told Xinhua in a recent interview.

      "While it has some short term political benefit to President Trump's political base of disenfranchised voters, it is unlikely to have any significant long-term economic benefit to working class people in America, nor address real issue of free and fair trade imbalances," Watkins said.

      Many U.S. scholars echoed Watkins' view, as Trump signed a memorandum last week that could impose tariffs on up to 60 billion U.S. dollars of imports from China and place restrictions on Chinese investments in the United States.

      China's Ministry of Commerce issued a warning the following day and also announced a plan for reciprocal tariffs on imported U.S. products worth about 3 billion dollars, targeting 128 categories of U.S. products including pork, wine and seamless steel tubes.

      "Tariffs are not going to correct the trade deficit with China," said Khairy Tourk, a professor with the Stuart School of Business of the Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago. "The reality is that the tariff burden will fall on the silent majority, the consumers. This would be difficult for the middle class and it could backfire on those responsible for the price increases."

      Tourk said China's measured response shows that Beijing is not eager to start a trade war. "Obviously, if the situation is to escalate, the global economy will suffer," the expert added.

      "A trade war only disadvantages our already disadvantaged populations," said William J. Carroll, president emeritus of the Benedictine University.

      U.S. National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) posted a statement on its website the same day when Trump signed the memorandum, in which NPPC President Jim Heimerl said higher tariffs on imports from China will in turn harm U.S. producers and undermine the rural economy.

      "No one wins in these tit-for-tat trade disputes, least of all the farmers and the consumers," said Heimerl.

      U.S. pork industry exported 1.1 billion dollars of products to China in 2017. "China is a very important market for U.S. pork producers. In 2017, China was the second largest U.S. pork export market by volume and the third largest export market by value," Jim Monroe, NPPC senior communications director, told Xinhua.

      Scholars said U.S. trade deficit is a problem, but not in the way Trump's administration thinks. "The deficit reflects lack of savings," said Tourk. It in fact reflects a deeper problem of imbalance in the flow of international investment.

      "The best policy to increase American exports is to increase productivity," the professor said, adding this will require years to accomplish.

      Editor: Zhou Xin
      Related News
      Xinhuanet

      Protectionist tariffs no solution for U.S. trade imbalance

      Source: Xinhua 2018-03-30 16:38:00

      CHICAGO, March 29 (Xinhua) -- U.S. protectionist measures of unilaterally imposing steep tariffs will not solve trade problem but risk opening a Pandora's box to backfire on its own economy, said U.S. experts.

      "The recent action by U.S. President (Donald) Trump to slap tariffs on China outside of the established WTO rules ... is troubling," Tom Watkins, an advisor to Michigan-China Innovation Center, told Xinhua in a recent interview.

      "While it has some short term political benefit to President Trump's political base of disenfranchised voters, it is unlikely to have any significant long-term economic benefit to working class people in America, nor address real issue of free and fair trade imbalances," Watkins said.

      Many U.S. scholars echoed Watkins' view, as Trump signed a memorandum last week that could impose tariffs on up to 60 billion U.S. dollars of imports from China and place restrictions on Chinese investments in the United States.

      China's Ministry of Commerce issued a warning the following day and also announced a plan for reciprocal tariffs on imported U.S. products worth about 3 billion dollars, targeting 128 categories of U.S. products including pork, wine and seamless steel tubes.

      "Tariffs are not going to correct the trade deficit with China," said Khairy Tourk, a professor with the Stuart School of Business of the Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago. "The reality is that the tariff burden will fall on the silent majority, the consumers. This would be difficult for the middle class and it could backfire on those responsible for the price increases."

      Tourk said China's measured response shows that Beijing is not eager to start a trade war. "Obviously, if the situation is to escalate, the global economy will suffer," the expert added.

      "A trade war only disadvantages our already disadvantaged populations," said William J. Carroll, president emeritus of the Benedictine University.

      U.S. National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) posted a statement on its website the same day when Trump signed the memorandum, in which NPPC President Jim Heimerl said higher tariffs on imports from China will in turn harm U.S. producers and undermine the rural economy.

      "No one wins in these tit-for-tat trade disputes, least of all the farmers and the consumers," said Heimerl.

      U.S. pork industry exported 1.1 billion dollars of products to China in 2017. "China is a very important market for U.S. pork producers. In 2017, China was the second largest U.S. pork export market by volume and the third largest export market by value," Jim Monroe, NPPC senior communications director, told Xinhua.

      Scholars said U.S. trade deficit is a problem, but not in the way Trump's administration thinks. "The deficit reflects lack of savings," said Tourk. It in fact reflects a deeper problem of imbalance in the flow of international investment.

      "The best policy to increase American exports is to increase productivity," the professor said, adding this will require years to accomplish.

      [Editor: huaxia]
      010020070750000000000000011100001370774261
      主站蜘蛛池模板: 日韩精品无码免费专区午夜不卡| 亚洲欧美日韩中文高清www777| 深夜免费在线视频| 四虎1515hm免费国产| 亚洲av成本人无码网站| 白白国产永久免费视频| 校园亚洲春色另类小说合集| 青青草国产免费久久久下载| 亚洲人成电影网站免费| 免费在线观看日韩| kk4kk免费视频毛片| 亚洲精品国产品国语在线| 午夜免费福利小电影| 亚洲视频一区在线| 免费无码又爽又刺激聊天APP| 日本亚洲免费无线码| 国产女高清在线看免费观看| 一级做a爰片久久免费| 亚洲国产日韩在线视频| 日本免费电影一区二区| 亚洲a∨无码男人的天堂| 免费毛片网站在线观看| 国产免费一区二区三区免费视频| 久久精品亚洲福利| 久久午夜羞羞影院免费观看| 亚洲大成色www永久网址| 国产99视频免费精品是看6| 中文字幕免费人成乱码中国| 亚洲色av性色在线观无码| 成年女人毛片免费视频| 九九九精品视频免费| 亚洲欧洲精品国产区| 午夜电影免费观看| 久久久久久国产a免费观看不卡| 久久亚洲精品成人| 成人性生活免费视频| 久久久久久久久久免免费精品| 亚洲精品白色在线发布| 夜色阁亚洲一区二区三区| 伊人久久免费视频| 四虎永久在线精品免费一区二区|