"/>

      <label id="xi47v"><meter id="xi47v"></meter></label>

      Obsession with protectionism will make U.S. lose trade wars: U.S. expert

      Source: Xinhua    2018-02-07 20:53:43

      BEIJING, Feb.7 (Xinhua) -- The Trump administration's obsession with protectionism and its trade measures against countries like China miss the root cause of U.S. trade deficits, and will probably make the United States a loser in trade wars, a U.S. economist warned in a recent article.

      In his Project Syndicate article "How to Lose a Trade War" published on Jan. 26, Stephen S. Roach, a senior fellow at Yale University, said the protectionist approach taken by the United States "could very well spark retaliatory measures that will only exacerbate the plight of beleaguered middle-class American consumers."

      "This is exactly how trade wars begin," he said.

      Roach pointed out that China is a clear target. On Jan. 23, Washington announced a series of tariffs on the import of solar panels and washing machines under the outdated Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974. The move primarily targets China and South Korea. "Significantly, the move could be the opening of salvo in a series of measures," he said.

      However, the moves could lead to the U.S. losing trade wars, the economist cautioned, listing three reasons.

      First, tariffs on solar panels and washing machines are "hopelessly out of step with transformative shifts in the global supply chains of both industries," Roach said.

      Second, Roach said Trump's protectionist policies pose a grave threat to "America's already daunting external funding requirements -- putting the pressure on U.S. interest rates, the dollar's exchange rate, or both."

      The Trump administration's focus on the trade imbalance with China has made it "miss the far broader macroeconomic forces that have spawned a U.S. multilateral trade deficit with 101 countries," Roach said.

      On top of that, it is expected that America's trade partners will retaliate with countermeasures, which would put "export-led U.S. economic growth at serious risk."

      He gave two examples. Since China is the third largest and fastest-growing U.S. export market, retaliatory tariffs by Beijing could harm America's major exports to China, including soybeans, aircraft, machinery and motor vehicle components. China could also cut down its purchase of U.S. treasuries, which would seriously affect their price.

      U.S. consumers are already feeling the impact. South Korea's LG Electronics, a leading foreign supplier of washing machines, has announced a 50-dollar price increase per unit in response to the tariffs.

      Trade wars are always for losers. Perhaps that is the greatest irony for a president who promised America would be the "ultimate winner."

      Similar empty promises were made in 1930 by Senator Reed Smoot and Representative Willis Hawley. They led to protectionist tariffs that exacerbated the Great Depression and destabilized the international order.

      Sadly, one of the most painful lessons of modern history has been all but forgotten.

      Editor: pengying
      Related News
      Xinhuanet

      Obsession with protectionism will make U.S. lose trade wars: U.S. expert

      Source: Xinhua 2018-02-07 20:53:43

      BEIJING, Feb.7 (Xinhua) -- The Trump administration's obsession with protectionism and its trade measures against countries like China miss the root cause of U.S. trade deficits, and will probably make the United States a loser in trade wars, a U.S. economist warned in a recent article.

      In his Project Syndicate article "How to Lose a Trade War" published on Jan. 26, Stephen S. Roach, a senior fellow at Yale University, said the protectionist approach taken by the United States "could very well spark retaliatory measures that will only exacerbate the plight of beleaguered middle-class American consumers."

      "This is exactly how trade wars begin," he said.

      Roach pointed out that China is a clear target. On Jan. 23, Washington announced a series of tariffs on the import of solar panels and washing machines under the outdated Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974. The move primarily targets China and South Korea. "Significantly, the move could be the opening of salvo in a series of measures," he said.

      However, the moves could lead to the U.S. losing trade wars, the economist cautioned, listing three reasons.

      First, tariffs on solar panels and washing machines are "hopelessly out of step with transformative shifts in the global supply chains of both industries," Roach said.

      Second, Roach said Trump's protectionist policies pose a grave threat to "America's already daunting external funding requirements -- putting the pressure on U.S. interest rates, the dollar's exchange rate, or both."

      The Trump administration's focus on the trade imbalance with China has made it "miss the far broader macroeconomic forces that have spawned a U.S. multilateral trade deficit with 101 countries," Roach said.

      On top of that, it is expected that America's trade partners will retaliate with countermeasures, which would put "export-led U.S. economic growth at serious risk."

      He gave two examples. Since China is the third largest and fastest-growing U.S. export market, retaliatory tariffs by Beijing could harm America's major exports to China, including soybeans, aircraft, machinery and motor vehicle components. China could also cut down its purchase of U.S. treasuries, which would seriously affect their price.

      U.S. consumers are already feeling the impact. South Korea's LG Electronics, a leading foreign supplier of washing machines, has announced a 50-dollar price increase per unit in response to the tariffs.

      Trade wars are always for losers. Perhaps that is the greatest irony for a president who promised America would be the "ultimate winner."

      Similar empty promises were made in 1930 by Senator Reed Smoot and Representative Willis Hawley. They led to protectionist tariffs that exacerbated the Great Depression and destabilized the international order.

      Sadly, one of the most painful lessons of modern history has been all but forgotten.

      [Editor: huaxia]
      010020070750000000000000011100001369568481
      主站蜘蛛池模板: 永久免费av无码网站韩国毛片| 美女18毛片免费视频| 久久www免费人成看国产片| AV激情亚洲男人的天堂国语| 国产精品免费精品自在线观看| 亚洲图片在线观看| 特级无码毛片免费视频尤物| 亚洲国产成人私人影院| 最近中文字幕大全免费视频| 亚洲日本国产精华液| 国产成人免费高清激情视频| 亚洲国产精品成人午夜在线观看| 午夜成人无码福利免费视频| 亚洲人AV永久一区二区三区久久| 亚洲嫩草影院久久精品| 91香焦国产线观看看免费| 亚洲国产精品成人久久久| 成人毛片免费观看视频在线| 日本亚洲中午字幕乱码| 国产专区一va亚洲v天堂| 久久国产精品2020免费m3u8| 免费成人在线观看| 亚洲成人福利网站| 免费看片A级毛片免费看| 日本一区二区三区免费高清在线| 很黄很色很刺激的视频免费| 国外亚洲成AV人片在线观看| 暖暖免费在线中文日本| 亚洲国产理论片在线播放| 国产传媒在线观看视频免费观看| fc2免费人成在线| 久久精品亚洲中文字幕无码麻豆| 成在人线AV无码免费| 亚洲精品黄色视频在线观看免费资源| 亚洲精品一品区二品区三品区| 蜜桃AV无码免费看永久| 羞羞视频在线免费观看| 精品亚洲麻豆1区2区3区| 国产最新凸凹视频免费| 久久午夜免费鲁丝片| 亚洲精品无码久久|